Current Status & Assessment
β Back to Project Hub
π― Current Phase: Exploration & Opportunity Discoveryβ
Phase: Month 0 - Planning and Opportunity Exploration Date: November 2025 Philosophy: Adaptive, opportunistic, flexible pathways to execution
β What's Confirmed (Decided)β
Vision & Core Approachβ
- Vision: Restore degraded ecosystems to healthy, biodiverse states
- Proof of concept: Start with 1-hectare pilot site
- Work model: Part-time Year 1-2 (15-25 hr/week, maintain jobs for security)
- Core team: 1-2 founders leading the project
- Geographic scope: Europe (EU citizenship/access)
- Methodology: Science-based, holistic, community-centered
- Financial philosophy: Bootstrap approach, no debt, sustainable from start
Core Constraints (Non-Negotiable)β
- Health & Security: Founders maintain healthcare access and financial security
- Legal & Ethical: All operations legal, transparent, accountable
- Ecological Integrity: Native species, evidence-based methods, no greenwashing
- Sustainability: Project must be financially viable, not dependent on perpetual donations
π What's Being Explored (TBD - No Commitment Yet)β
Funding Pathway (Decision: Month 4-6)β
Current Status: Exploring ALL options in parallel
Options under exploration:
- Option A: Crowdfunding campaign (β¬15-25k target)
- Option B: Major grants (β¬20-50k, DBU/Fundo Ambiental/EU LIFE)
- Option C: Angel donor/patron
- Option D: Prize/competition
- Option E: Ultra-lean bootstrap (β¬10k/year from founders)
- Option F: Partnership/collaboration (land + resources)
Timeline: Months 1-3 explore all β Month 4-6 commit to 1-2 most promising
Backup: If all fail β Option E (ultra-lean bootstrap)
β Full details: Funding Strategy
Location (Decision: Month 6 or when opportunity emerges)β
Current Status: Flexible across Europe, no commitment yet
Options being considered:
- Option A: Germany (baseline/default if no better opportunity)
- Option B: Portugal (strong candidate if opportunity emerges)
- Option C: Spain, France, Italy, other EU (open to opportunities)
Decision criteria:
- Where is there a β¬20-50k grant opportunity?
- Where can we find ideal land at affordable price?
- Where do we find mentorship/partnership?
- Default to Germany by Month 6 if no compelling opportunity elsewhere
β Full details: Geographic Strategy
Legal Structure (Decision: When location decided)β
Current Status: TBD - depends on final location
Options:
- If Germany: e.V. (β¬500, 4-8 weeks) OR gGmbH (β¬40k, 3-6 months, deferred to Year 3-5)
- If Portugal: AssociaΓ§Γ£o/IPSS (β¬500-2k, 2-4 months)
- If other EU: Equivalent nonprofit structure
- Year 1 option: Operate informally, register Year 2 if needed
Timeline: 4-8 weeks after location finalized
β Full details: Legal Structure Options
Land Acquisition (Decision: Month 6-12)β
Current Status: No specific site identified, exploring options
Options:
- Option A: Purchase (β¬5-30k depending on location)
- Option B: Long-term lease (β¬500-2k/year)
- Option C: Free/borrowed land (partnership with landowner)
- Option D: Municipality/church land (often cheap/free for restoration)
Decision criteria: What's available within budget in chosen location?
β Full details: Site Selection
Timeline (Decision: Emerges based on above)β
Current Status: 12-18 months baseline, flexible 6-36 months
Options:
- Fast Track: 6-9 months (if β¬20-30k secured upfront, can go full-time)
- Gradual Build: 12-18 months (baseline - part-time work, organic funding)
- Slow & Steady: 24-36 months (ultra-lean, maximum security)
- Opportunity-Driven: Variable (adapt to opportunities as they emerge)
Triggers to accelerate: Major grant awarded, perfect land found, can go full-time Triggers to decelerate: Funding slower, location unclear, more job focus needed
β Full details: Adaptive Timeline
π Strengths Assessment: What We Haveβ
π Exceptional Research Foundationβ
400+ carefully curated bookmarks covering:
Climate & Environmental Scienceβ
- Climate change impacts and urgency
- Carbon sequestration effectiveness
- Ecosystem services
- Biodiversity conservation strategies
Restoration Methodologiesβ
- Reforestation techniques (Miyawaki, natural regeneration)
- Soil health restoration
- Water management systems
- Biodiversity conservation
- Community-based models
- Holistic/systems approaches
β Applied in: Restoration Methodology
Technology & Innovationβ
- Agrivoltaics and solar integration
- Atmospheric water generation
- Precision monitoring
- Drone reforestation
- Sustainable building
β Applied in: Technology Integration
Successful Examplesβ
- Loess Plateau (China) - 35,000 kmΒ²
- Great Green Wall (Africa) - 7,775 km
- Gorongosa (Mozambique)
- Skjern River (Denmark)
β Referenced in: Project Vision
Financial Modelsβ
- Carbon credit markets
- Eco-tourism revenue
- Conservation finance
- Grant opportunities
β Applied in: Business Model
Assessment: This research foundation is truly comprehensive and demonstrates deep commitment. Far ahead of most starting projects.
ποΈ Well-Structured Documentationβ
Organized Documentation System:
- Clear project hierarchy
- Logical categorization
- Multiple planning versions (iterative thinking)
- Detailed task breakdowns
- Legal framework research
Assessment: Systematic thinking and excellent knowledge management system in place.
π± Clear Vision & Differentiationβ
Unique Approach:
- β Holistic (not just tree planting)
- β Science-based (ecological principles)
- β Community-centered (local engagement)
- β Financially sustainable (multiple revenue streams)
- β Technology-enhanced (solar, water, monitoring)
- β Scalable (replication design)
Assessment: Compelling and well-differentiated from typical tree-planting charities.
πͺ Adaptive Mindsetβ
Key Strengths:
- β Willing to go anywhere, work with anyone under right conditions
- β Multiple options for every major decision
- β No premature commitments to fixed paths
- β Security-first (maintain jobs, health, financial stability)
- β Opportunistic (ready to seize opportunities as they emerge)
- β Path creation (where no path exists, create it)
Assessment: Entrepreneurial, flexible approach well-suited to startup uncertainty.
π Opportunity Tracking Frameworkβ
Active Exploration (Months 1-3)β
What we're actively doing:
- Researching grant opportunities across multiple EU countries
- Networking with potential partners, mentors, advisors
- Building crowdfunding audience (social media, email list)
- Monitoring land opportunities in Germany, Portugal, other EU
- Connecting with NGOs and universities for partnerships
- Learning about legal structures in different countries
What we're NOT doing yet:
- β Committing to specific funding pathway
- β Choosing final location
- β Registering legal entity
- β Acquiring land
- β Hiring team
- β Launching campaigns
Why: Too early to commit without seeing what opportunities emerge
Decision Points & Timelineβ
Month 1-3: Exploration Phase
- Launch opportunity exploration across ALL pathways
- Research grants in Germany, Portugal, other EU
- Build network and connections
- Start audience building (if considering crowdfunding)
- Monitor land opportunities
- No major decisions yet
Month 3-4: Evaluation Phase
- Assess which pathways showing most promise
- What grants are realistic? What's the timeline?
- Is crowdfunding audience growing? Do we have 50+ soft commitments?
- Any strong partnership opportunities?
- Any exceptional land offers?
- Prepare to commit
Month 4-6: Commitment Phase
- Commit to 1-2 primary funding pathways based on what's emerged
- Finalize location decision (or default to Germany if no clear opportunity)
- Choose legal structure based on location
- Begin execution on chosen pathway
Month 6-12: Execution Phase
- Execute chosen funding pathway (campaign, grant applications, partnership)
- Register legal entity
- Secure land
- Begin setup and operations
Month 12-18: Operational Phase
- Site operational
- Initial plantings
- Proof of concept demonstrated
Adaptation Note: This timeline is baseline (Option B: Gradual Build). Actual timeline will adapt based on opportunities and constraints.
Trigger Events (Decide Immediately If These Occur)β
Major Funding Opportunity:
- Event: β¬20k+ grant awarded or strong grant pipeline emerges
- Action: Finalize location (where grant is), accelerate timeline, commit to Fast Track (6-9 months)
Perfect Land Offer:
- Event: Exceptional land opportunity (free, very cheap, ideal conditions)
- Action: Secure immediately, adapt plan around that location
Strong Partnership:
- Event: University, NGO, or mentor offers significant support in specific location
- Action: Serious consideration, decide within 2 weeks, potentially commit to that location
Crowdfunding Success:
- Event: Audience building exceeds expectations (300+ email list, 50+ soft commitments by Month 4)
- Action: Launch campaign Month 5-6, commit resources to campaign execution
Complete Funding Failure:
- Event: All pathways stall for 6+ months, no progress
- Action: Default to Option E (ultra-lean bootstrap), slower timeline (24-36 months)
π¦ Readiness Assessment by Domainβ
β Vision & Strategy: READYβ
- Status: Clear, compelling, differentiated
- Evidence: Comprehensive research, well-structured documentation, holistic thinking
- Assessment: Vision is solid. Ready to execute when opportunities clarify.
π‘ Funding: EXPLORING (Not Ready, Not Failed - In Process)β
Current State:
- No funding secured yet
- No applications submitted yet
- No campaigns launched yet
What This Means:
- NOT a failure - we're in exploration phase, this is expected
- NOT ready - can't acquire land or begin operations yet
- IN PROCESS - actively exploring multiple pathways
Multiple Pathways Under Exploration:
Option A: Crowdfunding (β¬15-25k)
- Status: Researching platforms, building audience foundation
- Timeline: If pursued, Month 1-4 prep β Month 5-6 campaign
- Success probability: 25-35% (environmental projects)
- Decision point: Month 4 (do we have 50+ soft commitments?)
Option B: Major Grants (β¬20-50k)
- Status: Researching DBU (Germany), Fundo Ambiental (Portugal), EU LIFE
- Timeline: 6-12 month application process
- Success probability: 10-20% per grant (apply to 10-15)
- Decision point: Month 3-4 (which grants are realistic for us?)
Option C: Angel Donor/Patron
- Status: Not actively pursuing yet
- Timeline: 3-6 months if network exists
- Success probability: Low unless we know wealthy environmentalists
- Decision point: Month 2-3 (do we have any warm contacts?)
Option D: Prize/Competition
- Status: Will enter 2-3 if found
- Timeline: Variable
- Success probability: Low but high upside
- Decision point: Enter opportunistically, don't rely on it
Option E: Ultra-Lean Bootstrap (β¬10k/year)
- Status: Fallback plan, always available
- Timeline: 24-36 months (slower but reliable)
- Success probability: 80%+ (we control it)
- Decision point: Default to this if others fail by Month 6
Option F: Partnership/Collaboration
- Status: Networking actively
- Timeline: Unpredictable
- Success probability: 20-30%
- Decision point: Seize if opportunity emerges
Financial Readiness Timeline:
- Month 4-6: Commit to 1-2 pathways based on what's emerged
- Month 6-12: Execute chosen pathway(s)
- Month 12-18: Funding secured (target)
Backup Plan: If all fail β Option E (ultra-lean bootstrap with founder contributions)
β Full strategy: Funding Strategy
π‘ Legal Structure: OPTIONS IDENTIFIED (Not Ready - Deferred Pending Location)β
Current State:
- No legal entity registered yet
- No lawyer engaged yet
- No registration submitted
What This Means:
- NOT a failure - premature to register before location decided
- NOT ready - can't fundraise formally yet (but can prepare)
- OPTIONS CLEAR - we know what to do when location is decided
Legal Structure Options by Location:
If Germany:
-
Option A: e.V. (Registered Association)
- Cost: β¬500
- Timeline: 4-8 weeks
- Best for: Grant-focused, community model, low capital
- Status: Strong candidate if Germany chosen
-
Option B: gGmbH (Nonprofit Company)
- Cost: β¬40,000 capital requirement
- Timeline: 3-6 months
- Best for: Commercial revenue, investors, Year 3-5 if revenue justifies
- Status: Deferred to future, not Year 1
If Portugal:
- Option: AssociaΓ§Γ£o/IPSS
- Cost: β¬500-β¬2,000
- Timeline: 2-4 months
- Best for: Operating in Portugal, local credibility
- Status: Strong candidate if Portugal chosen
If Other EU:
- Option: Equivalent nonprofit structure (Association loi 1901 in France, AsociaciΓ³n in Spain, etc.)
- Cost: β¬500-β¬2,000 typically
- Timeline: 2-4 months
- Status: Will research when country decided
If Year 1 Informal:
- Option: No legal entity Year 1
- Cost: β¬0
- Timeline: Immediate
- Best for: Testing model, ultra-lean approach, register Year 2 if successful
- Status: Viable for bootstrap approach
Decision Criteria:
- Which country has best opportunity? β Register there
- Do we have β¬40k budget? β If no, e.V./AssociaΓ§Γ£o; if yes, consider gGmbH
- Timeline urgency? β e.V./AssociaΓ§Γ£o fastest (4-8 weeks)
- Can we wait? β Informal Year 1, register Year 2
Legal Readiness Timeline:
- Month 6: Location decision finalized
- Month 6-7: Engage lawyer, draft documents
- Month 7-8: Submit registration
- Month 8-9: Entity registered and operational
Current Status: TBD - Decision deferred until location and funding opportunities clarify (expected Month 6)
β Full details: Legal Structure Options
π‘ Land: CRITERIA DEFINED (Not Ready - Deferred Pending Location & Funding)β
Current State:
- No specific site identified
- No land acquired or leased
- No site visits conducted yet
What This Means:
- NOT a failure - premature to commit before location and budget clear
- NOT ready - can't begin restoration yet
- CRITERIA CLEAR - we know what to look for when location decided
Land Acquisition Options:
Option A: Purchase
- Germany: β¬15-30k for 1 hectare
- Portugal: β¬5-15k for 1 hectare
- Pros: Own the asset, long-term security, equity
- Cons: High upfront capital, committed to location
- Best if: Strong funding secured (β¬20-30k), confident in location
Option B: Long-Term Lease
- Cost: β¬500-2,000/year (either location)
- Pros: Low upfront cost, test before committing, flexibility
- Cons: No equity, landlord dependency, annual cost
- Best if: Limited capital (β¬8-12k total), want to test first
Option C: Free/Borrowed Land
- Cost: β¬0 or minimal
- Pros: Zero land cost, can allocate budget to operations
- Cons: Requires right partner, may have conditions, less control
- Best if: Partnership opportunity emerges
Option D: Municipality/Church Land
- Cost: Often free or very cheap for restoration projects
- Pros: Low cost, community support, legitimacy
- Cons: Bureaucracy, may have restrictions, limited sites
- Best if: Can navigate local relationships
Site Selection Criteria (location-adaptive):
Core Requirements (any location):
- 1 hectare minimum
- Degraded/suitable for restoration
- Legal access and rights
- Water access or rainfall adequate
- Within budget (β¬5-30k purchase or β¬500-2k/year lease)
Location-Specific Criteria:
- Temperate (Germany): 700-800mm rain, suitable for Oak/Beech/Birch
- Mediterranean (Portugal): 400-600mm rain, suitable for Cork Oak/Holm Oak
Land Readiness Timeline:
- Month 4-6: Location decided β Begin land search
- Month 6-9: Identify 10-15 potential sites
- Month 9-10: Visit top 5 sites
- Month 10-11: Site assessment and negotiation
- Month 11-12: Land acquired or lease signed
Current Status: Deferred until location and funding clarified (Month 6)
β Full details: Site Selection
π‘ Team: FOUNDERS CONFIRMED (Others TBD)β
Current State:
- 1-2 core founders committed
- No staff hired
- No formal advisory board
What This Means:
- PARTIAL READY - founders can start work
- NOT fully ready - limited capacity, need advisors/volunteers
- ADAPTIVE - team scales with budget and growth
Team Evolution Plan:
Year 1-2: Lean Founder Team (Part-Time)
- Team: 1-2 founders
- Time: 15-25 hr/week (keep jobs)
- Cost: β¬0-β¬20k/year (unpaid or minimal stipend)
- Focus: Prove concept, secure land, initial operations
- Status: Confirmed
Year 2-4: Transition Team (Part-Time to Full-Time)
- Team: Founders increase hours
- Time: 25-35 hr/week (part-time jobs)
- Cost: β¬20-40k/year
- Focus: Grow operations, build revenue
- Status: TBD based on Year 1 success
Year 4+: Professional Team (Full-Time)
- Team: Founders full-time + 1-2 staff
- Time: 40-60 hr/week
- Cost: β¬60-120k/year (3-4 people)
- Focus: Scale, sustainability, expansion
- Status: Only if revenue β¬30-50k/year stable
Advisory/Support Network:
- 3-5 volunteer advisors (legal, ecological, business)
- University partnerships for research
- NGO collaborations for expertise
- Skill gaps filled by advisors, not hires
Team Readiness: Adequate for Year 1-2 bootstrap approach
β Full details: Team Roles & Work Model
π’ Methodology: READY (Adaptive to Location)β
Current State:
- Comprehensive research complete
- Two approaches defined (Temperate & Mediterranean)
- Methods evidence-based and proven
Adaptive Methodology:
If Temperate Location (Germany, N France, etc.):
- Species: Oak, Beech, Birch, etc.
- Climate: 700-800mm rain
- Planting: Apr-May
If Mediterranean Location (Portugal, Spain, S France, Italy):
- Species: Cork Oak, Holm Oak, Stone Pine, Mediterranean shrubs
- Climate: 400-600mm rain
- Planting: Oct-Feb
Methodology Readiness: Ready - will adapt to final location and site conditions
β Full details: Restoration Methodology
π‘ Public Presence: NOT STARTED (Deferred to Month 2-4)β
Current State:
- No website
- No social media
- No public communications
What This Means:
- NOT ready - can't do crowdfunding or broad outreach yet
- NOT urgent - can build during Months 2-4 if needed
- ADAPTIVE - level of presence depends on funding pathway chosen
Public Presence Options:
If Crowdfunding:
- Need: Website, social media, email list, video, strong presence
- Timeline: Month 1-4 build audience, Month 5-6 campaign
- Cost: β¬2-5k (video, design, ads)
If Grants Only:
- Need: Basic website, minimal social
- Timeline: Month 4-6 (after grant applications)
- Cost: β¬500-1k (simple site)
If Bootstrap/Partnership:
- Need: Very minimal, optional
- Timeline: Year 2 if needed
- Cost: β¬0-500
Decision Point: Month 3-4 when funding pathway clearer
β Full details: Marketing & Communications
π Maturity Comparison: Where We Are vs Where We're Goingβ
Current Phase: Exploration (Month 0)β
β What We Have:
- Clear vision and values
- Comprehensive research
- Systematic planning
- Multiple options identified
- Adaptive mindset
- Core constraints defined
π What We're Exploring:
- Funding pathway (6 options)
- Location (5+ countries)
- Legal structure (4+ options)
- Land acquisition (4 options)
- Timeline (4 scenarios)
β What We Don't Have (Yet - Deferred by Design):
- Legal entity (wait for location)
- Secured funding (exploring pathways)
- Acquired land (wait for location + funding)
- Public presence (wait for funding pathway decision)
- Team beyond founders (adequate for Year 1-2)
Target Phase: Execution (Month 6-12)β
What We'll Have Decided:
- β Funding pathway committed (1-2 of 6 options)
- β Location finalized (or defaulted to Germany)
- β Legal structure chosen (based on location)
- β Land identified (searching actively)
- β Timeline clarified (based on above decisions)
What We'll Be Doing:
- Executing chosen funding pathway (campaign, applications, partnership)
- Registering legal entity
- Acquiring land
- Building public presence (if needed for funding)
- Networking and partnerships
Target Phase: Operational (Month 12-18)β
What We'll Have:
- β Legal entity registered
- β Funding secured (β¬15-30k)
- β Land acquired or leased (1 hectare)
- β Site setup begun
- β Initial plantings (200-500 trees)
- β Baseline measurements
- β Proof of concept underway
Gap Analysis: We're in the right phase. Exploration β Decision β Execution β Operation is the natural progression.
β±οΈ Timeline Reality Checkβ
Realistic Pathways to Operational Siteβ
Option A: Fast Track (6-9 months) - Probability: 10-20%
- If: β¬20-30k secured upfront (major grant or perfect donor)
- If: Can go full-time or significantly increase hours
- If: Location and land identified quickly
- Timeline:
- Month 1-2: Grant awarded or donor commits β Location decision
- Month 2-3: Register entity, begin land search
- Month 3-5: Secure land
- Month 6-9: Setup and first plantings
- Status: Unlikely but possible if everything goes right
Option B: Gradual Build (12-18 months) - Probability: 50-60% (BASELINE)
- If: Part-time work (15-25 hr/week), keep jobs
- If: Crowdfunding or gradual grant success
- If: Organic opportunities emerge
- Timeline:
- Months 1-6: Prep, crowdfunding, location research
- Months 6-9: Location decided, entity registered, land search
- Months 9-12: Land secured, setup begun
- Months 12-18: Operations and plantings
- Status: Realistic baseline scenario
Option C: Slow & Steady (24-36 months) - Probability: 70-80%
- If: Ultra-lean bootstrap (β¬10k/year from founders)
- If: Very part-time (10-15 hr/week)
- If: Maximum security (keep full-time jobs)
- Timeline:
- Year 1: Save β¬10k, lease land, minimal setup
- Year 2: Operate, upgrade, save more
- Year 3: Buy land or expand
- Status: Very achievable, lowest risk
Option D: Opportunity-Driven (Variable) - Probability: 20-30%
- If: Major opportunity emerges that changes timeline
- Examples:
- β¬30k grant Month 3 β Accelerate to Fast Track
- Free land offered Month 6 β Skip fundraising, setup Month 7
- University partnership β Joint timeline based on their schedule
- Status: Unpredictable but possible
Recommendation: Plan for Option B (12-18 months) as baseline. Stay flexible for A, C, or D as opportunities emerge or constraints change.
π― Success Metrics by Phaseβ
Exploration Phase Success (Months 1-3)β
Metrics:
- Researched 10+ grant opportunities across 3+ countries
- Connected with 5+ potential partners/advisors/mentors
- Identified 3+ viable legal structure options
- Monitored 10+ land opportunities in target regions
- (If crowdfunding) Built email list to 50+ subscribers
- Evaluated all 6 funding pathways
Success: Have clarity on 1-2 most promising pathways to pursue
Commitment Phase Success (Months 4-6)β
Metrics:
- Committed to 1-2 primary funding pathways
- Location decided (or default to Germany confirmed)
- Legal structure chosen
- Land search parameters defined
- (If crowdfunding) Email list 150-200, soft commits 30-50
- (If grants) Applications submitted to 3-5 grants
Success: Clear path forward, actively executing
Execution Phase Success (Months 6-12)β
Metrics:
- β¬10k+ funding secured or strong pipeline
- Legal entity registered
- 5+ potential land sites identified
- 1+ partnership MOU signed
- Public presence launched (if needed)
- Top land site selected
Success: Funding pathway yielding results, entity operational, land pipeline strong
Operational Phase Success (Months 12-18)β
Metrics:
- β¬15-30k funding secured
- Land acquired or leased
- Site setup complete
- First plantings (200-500 trees)
- Baseline measurements established
- Proof of concept documented
Success: Site operational, restoration begun, model being proven
πͺ Unique Strengths That Enable Successβ
1. Adaptive Flexibilityβ
Why this matters: Most projects fail because they over-commit to one path. Our multiple-option approach means one failure doesn't derail the project.
2. Founder Security Focusβ
Why this matters: Maintaining jobs and health means sustainability. Many projects fail when founders burn out or run out of money.
3. Exceptional Researchβ
Why this matters: 400+ bookmarks show deep understanding. We're not naive idealists - we know the science, challenges, and proven methods.
4. Holistic Thinkingβ
Why this matters: Systems-level restoration is more effective and fundable than simple tree-planting. Our approach stands out.
5. Financial Realismβ
Why this matters: Understanding that we need sustainable revenue (not perpetual donations) means long-term viability.
6. Opportunistic Mindsetβ
Why this matters: Willingness to go anywhere, work with anyone, seize opportunities means we'll find paths others miss.
7. No Premature Commitmentsβ
Why this matters: By deferring decisions until context is clear, we avoid costly mistakes and stay agile.
π¬ What Happens Nextβ
Month 1-3: Active Explorationβ
Your focus:
- Research grants in Germany, Portugal, other EU
- Network actively - reach out to NGOs, universities, potential mentors
- Monitor land opportunities - set up alerts, browse listings
- Explore partnerships - where can we find support?
- (If crowdfunding route) Start building audience - social media, content, email list
- Stay flexible - don't commit to anything yet
What NOT to do:
- β Don't register legal entity yet (wait for location)
- β Don't commit to crowdfunding campaign yet (wait to see if audience grows)
- β Don't sign up for land yet (wait for location + funding)
- β Don't quit your job yet (keep security)
Month 3-4: Evaluation & Decision Prepβ
Your focus:
-
Assess progress:
- Which funding pathways showing promise?
- Any strong grant opportunities identified?
- Is crowdfunding audience growing? (target: 50+ soft commitments)
- Any partnership opportunities emerging?
- Any exceptional land offers?
-
Prepare to commit:
- If crowdfunding looking good β Prep for Month 5-6 launch
- If grants looking good β Finalize applications
- If bootstrap only β Plan Year 1 ultra-lean approach
- If partnership emerging β Negotiate terms
Decision: Commit to 1-2 primary pathways by end of Month 4
Month 4-6: Commitment & Executionβ
Your focus:
-
Execute chosen pathway(s):
- If crowdfunding β Launch campaign Month 5-6
- If grants β Submit 5-10 applications
- If partnership β Formalize agreement
- If bootstrap β Confirm founder contributions, plan Year 1
-
Finalize location:
- Where did opportunities emerge? β Go there
- No clear opportunity? β Default to Germany
- Decide by Month 6
-
Choose legal structure:
- Based on location chosen
- Engage lawyer if needed
Output: By Month 6, you have clarity on funding, location, legal structure
Month 6-12: Executionβ
Your focus:
- Secure funding (execute on chosen pathway)
- Register legal entity (4-8 weeks)
- Search for land (10-15 sites β 5 visits β 1 chosen)
- Build partnerships (1-2 MOUs)
- Public presence (if needed for funding)
Output: By Month 12, funding secured, entity registered, land acquired
Month 12-18: Operationsβ
Your focus:
- Site setup (infrastructure, tools, water, shelter)
- Initial plantings (200-500 trees)
- Baseline measurements
- Community relationships
- Documentation (proof of concept)
Output: Operational restoration site, proof of concept demonstrated
π Call to Actionβ
Your Next Step: Choose Your Paceβ
The preparation phase is complete. You have:
- β The knowledge (exceptional research)
- β The vision (clear and differentiated)
- β The options (multiple pathways identified)
- β The flexibility (adaptive mindset)
Now you need to choose when to start and at what pace:
Option 1: Start Month 1 (Aggressive Exploration)
- Begin networking, grant research, land monitoring immediately
- Commit 15-25 hr/week
- Target: Month 12-18 to operational site
Option 2: Start Month 2-3 (Moderate Preparation)
- Take Month 1-2 to finalize founder team, build runway
- Launch exploration Month 2-3
- Target: Month 15-21 to operational site
Option 3: Start Month 4-6 (Patient Preparation)
- Build up founder savings, plan thoroughly
- Launch exploration Month 4-6
- Target: Month 18-24 to operational site
Option 4: Bootstrap Year 1 (Ultra-Lean)
- Save β¬10k over Year 1, no active fundraising
- Launch operations Year 2
- Target: Month 24-36 to operational site
Which matches your current situation and risk tolerance?
First Action: β Read Adaptive Timeline to understand full pathway options
Related Documentsβ
What's Decided:
- Vision & Mission
- Core Approach
- Success Factors
What's Being Explored:
- Funding Pathways (6 options)
- Legal Structure (4+ options)
- Location & Land (multiple options)
- Timeline Scenarios (4 options)
How We'll Decide:
- Risk Management & Decision Framework
- Team & Work Model
- Public Presence Strategy
Document Version: 2025.11 (2025.11.13 01:56) Part of: Strategic Documentation Category: Reality Type: Status Document Status: Active