Skip to main content

Task 1: Identify Stakeholders - Project Template

Part of: Plan Section (Vision → Plan → Reality)
Type: Template/Playbook for Small Plot Restoration
Status: Template - Customize for Your Project

← Back to Project Hub

Purpose​

Stakeholder identification is the foundational step in community engagement. Before you can effectively communicate, involve, or share benefits with your community, you must first understand who that community is.

This is a template. Customize stakeholder categories and identification methods based on your specific community, cultural context, and project scope.

🎯 Non-Negotiables (Science Consensus)​

These must be followed - they are based on scientific and ethical consensus:

  1. Comprehensive Identification Required: All relevant stakeholders must be identified before beginning engagement. You cannot engage people you don't know exist.

  2. Inclusive Approach: Stakeholder identification must be inclusive and reach beyond obvious groups. Marginalized and underrepresented voices must be included.

  3. Early Identification: Stakeholder identification must happen early, before major decisions are made. Late identification leads to opposition and conflict.

  4. Documentation: All identified stakeholders must be documented with their interests, concerns, and relationship to the project. This is essential for effective engagement.

  5. Ongoing Process: Stakeholder identification is not one-time - new stakeholders may emerge and should be added as the project evolves.

🔀 Options & Pathways​

Pathway A: Comprehensive Professional Assessment​

When to use: Large projects, complex stakeholder landscape, when thoroughness is critical, grant requirements

Approach:

  • Hire professional community engagement consultant
  • Systematic stakeholder mapping
  • Power analysis and influence mapping
  • Comprehensive database development
  • Professional validation

Pros:

  • Most thorough
  • Professional expertise
  • Credible for grants
  • Comprehensive coverage

Cons:

  • Higher cost (€1,000-5,000)
  • Requires professional expertise
  • May take longer

Pathway B: Community-Led Identification​

When to use: Strong community connections, limited budget, want community ownership, local knowledge important

Approach:

  • Engage community members to identify stakeholders
  • Use community networks and relationships
  • Local knowledge and connections
  • Community members conduct identification
  • Builds community ownership

Pros:

  • Lower cost (€0-500)
  • Leverages local knowledge
  • Builds community engagement
  • Accessible approach

Cons:

  • May miss some stakeholders
  • Requires community coordination
  • May need validation
  • Depends on community relationships

Pathway C: Hybrid Approach​

When to use: Most projects - balance of systematic approach and local knowledge

Approach:

  • Professional guidance on methodology
  • Community members conduct identification
  • Expert review of completeness
  • Systematic documentation

Pros:

  • Good balance
  • Integrates local knowledge
  • Professional validation
  • Flexible

Cons:

  • Requires coordination
  • May need ongoing consultation

📋 Implementation Steps​

Step 1: Understand Stakeholder Categories​

Stakeholders fall into several overlapping categories:

Primary Stakeholders (Directly Affected):

  • People living adjacent to or near restoration site
  • Current land users (farmers, ranchers, recreationists)
  • Communities dependent on ecosystem services from site
  • Indigenous peoples with traditional ties to land
  • Those whose livelihoods depend on site resources

Secondary Stakeholders (Indirectly Affected):

  • Broader community members in watershed or region
  • Businesses that might benefit or lose from changes
  • Regional residents who use area occasionally
  • Future generations (represented by youth, educators)

Key Influencers:

  • Local political leaders and officials
  • Community leaders (formal and informal)
  • Media representatives
  • Religious or spiritual leaders
  • Respected elders or long-time residents
  • Environmental advocates and activists

Institutional Stakeholders:

  • Government agencies (local, regional, national)
  • NGOs and conservation organizations
  • Academic and research institutions
  • Funders and donors
  • Private sector companies
  • Professional associations

Internal Stakeholders:

  • Your project team and staff
  • Partner organizations
  • Board members or advisors
  • Volunteers and supporters

Potential Opponents:

  • Those who benefit from current degraded conditions
  • Groups with different land use priorities
  • Those who distrust conservation or government
  • Competing interests for resources
  • People concerned about restrictions or changes

Step 2: Use Multiple Identification Methods​

Desktop Research:

  • Government records and databases
  • Media coverage of area
  • Social media and online communities
  • Organizational directories
  • Public meeting records

Community Consultation:

  • Ask existing contacts who else should be involved
  • Use snowball sampling (ask stakeholders to identify others)
  • Community meetings and listening sessions
  • Door-to-door outreach
  • Public notices and announcements

Field Observation:

  • Visit the area and observe who uses it
  • Attend community events
  • Visit local gathering places
  • Observe land use patterns

Expert Consultation:

  • Local government officials
  • Community leaders
  • NGOs working in area
  • Academic researchers
  • Long-time residents

Step 3: Map Stakeholders​

For Each Stakeholder, Document:

  • Name and contact information
  • Category (primary, secondary, influencer, etc.)
  • Interest in project (supportive, neutral, opposed, unknown)
  • Influence level (high, medium, low)
  • Relationship to site
  • Key concerns or priorities
  • Preferred communication methods
  • Engagement strategy

Create Stakeholder Map:

  • Visual representation of stakeholders
  • Show relationships between stakeholders
  • Indicate influence and interest
  • Identify key players and gatekeepers

Step 4: Prioritize Engagement​

High Priority:

  • High influence + high interest
  • Directly affected stakeholders
  • Key decision-makers
  • Potential strong opponents
  • Potential strong allies

Medium Priority:

  • Moderate influence or interest
  • Indirectly affected
  • Can be engaged as needed

Low Priority:

  • Low influence and low interest
  • Monitor but minimal engagement

Step 5: Validate Completeness​

Check for Gaps:

  • Are all directly affected groups included?
  • Are marginalized voices represented?
  • Are opponents identified?
  • Are all key influencers included?
  • Are institutional stakeholders covered?

Seek Feedback:

  • Ask identified stakeholders who else should be included
  • Review with community members
  • Check with experts
  • Update as needed

💡 Customization Notes​

When using this template for your project:

  1. Cultural Context: Adapt stakeholder categories to your specific cultural context

  2. Community Size: Adjust methods for small vs large communities

  3. Geographic Scope: Define stakeholder boundaries based on your project scope

  4. Language: Ensure identification reaches all language communities

  5. Accessibility: Use methods accessible to all community members

  6. Local Knowledge: Leverage local knowledge and relationships

Remember: This is a template. Your actual project will have specific community dynamics and social relationships that make it unique.

Next Steps​

Once stakeholders are identified: → Task 2: Communicate Plans

Remember: You cannot engage people you don't know exist. Thorough stakeholder identification is the foundation of effective engagement.

This is a template. Customize it for your project.